As an easterner, even if we criticize Confucian ethics, where does the simplest criterion come from?
Culture has the foundation of argument. For example, the countries in Roba came down in one continuous line from Guxilai’s idea world to medieval scholastic theology and then to the reconstruction of absolute spirit after the Renaissance.
The philosophical argument, theological argument and economic argument about the pursuit of the ideal world to the revelation of God and the assumption of human nature to establish a social contract all have their basis.
Euclid knows everything, right? Aden may not be very clear that he has deduced the whole principle body on the basis of several postulates.
Sociology is also like this. Some people say that the lack of this kind of entity in the culture of the Eastern Nationalism is a lack of understanding or that later generations did not seriously build it, but they did not know who we were until they built it clearly, thus coming. "
Wang Fengshou and Shen Si are both students of Kefu. Wang Fengshou has been lectured by several old people that he pays too much attention to planning and is a bit biased towards the road, but he is still Kefu’s brother in his bones.
Wang Fengshou, the author of this textbook, did not participate in the final examination and approval of Ke Mengchao by Shen Si, who is now the Minister of Education of Guinea.
Shi Shen four also made mistakes and was euphemistically criticized by Hua Zhen. Who can have nothing wrong with his hometown wish? Yu Hua is really good at himself, so he is not only criticized, but also often beaten
No one criticized the three old people? Of course, it’s not that they often argue when they want to get together, not only mocking each other and exposing shortcomings, but also digging up old scores from many years.
However, the other two old men didn’t find fault with the textbook, not that it was perfect, but that they all thought it was appropriate and necessary.
Having said that, what exactly is this textbook?
Chapter 431, talk about filial piety
Of course, the textbook of Guinea is to meet the needs of Guinea. In the actual training, it is another textbook, which is the first ten speeches of Charles. The first purpose of teaching is to explain why Charles said that.
This is both a cultural enlightenment and an introduction to spoken English in the East.
The ten speeches were I am Charles, Opportunity is Hope, We are in Kline District, Can’t Be Stupid, Labor creates the world, Building a Beautiful Home Together, Who is our friend, Unity is Power, New Day and Master of Destiny.
The textbook must be so simple that quite a few Chinese people can understand it, so you can imagine how simple it is. The basis of its analysis of all problems comes from the introduction of the two concepts of "loyalty and forgiveness"
Niu Ping has read this textbook before asking if Hua Zhenxing is a Confucian brother.
The so-called "loyalty" center is to read the fourth place, that is, "if you want to stand up, you can stand up, and if you want to achieve it, you can achieve it"; The so-called "forgiveness" is "don’t do to others what you don’t want others to do to you"
These two sentences are easy to explain and understand. The former mainly says what should be advocated depends on morality, and the latter mainly says what should be banned depends on law. Both can be cross-verified.
Therefore, when people face complicated things, they have the simplest values and standards.
When Shen Si compiled the textbook, he also introduced many Confucian concepts, including various Confucian moral standards, but they were all deleted or moved to the end as "super-outline" introduction articles, leaving two such articles.
It is like the postulate in several schools, which not only deduces the whole ethical body in the textbook, but also explains the principles of order in politics, economy and law.
This is not a Confucian book, but a social training textbook with less than 60 thousand words. First, tell people two simple arguments, and then explain the new alliance policy on the basis of them, even if it is such a trivial matter as "no defecation anywhere"
You don’t want to accidentally step on Xiang when you go out, so don’t fly anywhere. This sentence can be made clear before it can become the basis for formulating social management norms
Someone is going to say again, I do realize this, but it is really urgent that there is no toilet nearby, which involves solving the problem and then promoting public decision-making basis
When the sanitation campaign was first carried out in Kelin District, public toilets were built in every block, and the number of squatting places was designed according to the number of residents.
Don’t feel ridiculous. This textbook is not for students to read by themselves, because most of them are still illiterate, but for teachers to explain in class.
In the same way, it can be deduced that you can’t steal, rob or kill …
For another example, what should be filial to parents and courteous to others is actually a remark that "I want to stand up and be a man, and I want to achieve it"-"What I want depends on my father"
As beautiful and reasonable as possible, you expect women to treat you like this, so you treat your parents like this. This ethical requirement is that today’s society in China has exceeded the standard, because many children can’t find a father.
But don’t you know how to treat your mother? Even if it is for your own children and relatively noble ethical requirements, it should usually go beyond the status quo and represent a social ideal.
People who can’t find their parents also hope that they can have parents, especially when they are young, so as beautiful and reasonable as possible. If parents want them to treat themselves, they should treat women in reality.
This is the "filial piety" in the culture of the Eastern Nationalism.
Filial piety is an acquired argument equivalent to "theorem", while loyalty and forgiveness is an innate argument equivalent to "postulate". Filial piety can be derived from the principle of loyalty and forgiveness, which can also explain various cultural phenomena such as "worshipping the heavens and worshiping the ancestors"
The specific forms of filial piety are different in different times and backgrounds. In some periods of Eastern history, the requirements for the form of filial piety have become more and more dogmatic and patriarchal, with decadent characteristics.
People should criticize these dogmatic and patriarchal filial piety, and it is a reaction to filial piety to ask them to maintain some decadent legal system in the name of filial piety
When contemporary orientals criticize the patriarchal dogma of historical filial piety, their subconscious value judgments and argumentation methods all point out that these patriarchal dogmas are hypocritical and they do not represent true filial piety.
People have not criticized filial piety, nor have they overturned the process of argument. Apart from those who have ulterior motives, the starting point of most people is not unfilial virtue.
For example, Kefu once saw Shen Si from Congcong telling Manman that his old man was very angry and scolded Shen Si on the spot and forbade him to teach again, but schools in several countries also needed the Student Code.
There is no new alliance in the history of the patriarchal clan system in the East in Guinea. This textbook introduction is the origin of filial piety.
The original Coffey wanted to delete this part, thinking that it was too deep for most students to be used as an introductory education. This textbook must be very simplified and then studied in the textbook of the advanced class.
____ _w_w_w________
However, Shen Si managed to write it out, and he was reluctant to delete it. He strongly urged to keep it, so he simplified it and put it in the textbook. Finally, it was used as a classroom extension and high.
If we directly talk about the Analects of Qiu on whether it is "decadent and backward", it will be even more beyond the outline. Most students in Guinea don’t know what to say.
The four dimensions and five permanents in the culture of the Eastern Nationalism, that is, "courtesy, righteousness, honesty, shame" and "benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom and faith", were not directly thrown out in the textbook, and they were also put out. Finally, they were deduced through those two arguments and then introduced and expounded.
Ye Yining is reading the textbook, while Hua Zhen is looking at the textbook. She somehow thinks of Kefu’s old man’s house.
Some people criticize Qiu and often say that "Qiu talks about the maintenance of rites, which has long been deserted, and Zhou rites represent a backward and conservative thought"
Kefu’s great-grandfather Tanqiu really likes to talk about Zhou Rites, because he hates and hates the collapse of order when he sees it, but he doesn’t miss the times when order was the best in history until he saw the later generations re-establish order.
Yuqiu people are neither conservative nor narrow-minded, but they are quite liberal, which can be called a different kind in that aristocratic era and has also completed the enlightenment to later generations.
Qiu Tan’s ceremony is not only a Zhou ceremony, but also a Zhou ceremony, which is what he thought was the embodiment of "benevolence" in that era, and the ritual body is the embodiment of benevolence and benevolence is "loyalty and forgiveness"
Ke Mengchao’s remarks are suspected of being taboo, but Hua Zhenxing thinks that his old man’s words are very reasonable. Of course, such words can’t be written into the training course textbook. This is his old man’s teaching to Hua Zhen alone
There is no history of the Zhou Dynasty in Yu Jili Guogen, and of course there is no confusion about Zhou rites. It is necessary to introduce Confucianism.
All social ethics bodies are based on argument, and all kinds of deduction and changes are produced by adding some new external factors such as the needs of the times, the needs of governance and the needs of social stability and development.
Some people may not realize the unique value of establishing this basic cultural body. First of all, the only place is that it is another belief body without the participation of "God"
All values are derived from the two most fundamental propositions, which are derived from people’s own needs. It is ok to call it Confucianism by another name, but the essence is the same.
Therefore, the unique characteristics of the East people or the East culture treat the gods with a rather liberal attitude, with the critical spirit of equal consultation, merger, storage and resistance
Does God need to be criticized by others? You heard me right. It’s true.
No matter which bodhisattva or god, it doesn’t prevent the same person from going to worship. With the development of society, even if there is no god, it doesn’t prevent someone from getting out the kitchen god for you. Let’s not talk about Ce Shen. Have you ever seen the god of the senior high school entrance examination, the god of the college entrance examination, and the god of the fourth and sixth grades?